4.7 Article

Huntington's disease-like 2 is associated with CUG repeat-containing RNA foci

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 272-282

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21081

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38054, NS16375] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Huntington's disease-like 2 (HDL2) is caused by a CAG/CTG expansion mutation on chromosome 16q24.3. The repeat falls, in the CTG orientation, within a variably spliced exon of junctophilin-3 (IPH3). The existence of a JPH3 splice variant with the CTG repeat in 3' untranslated region suggested that transcripts containing an expanded CUG repeat could play a role in the pathogenesis of HDL2, similar to the proposed pathogenic role of expanded CUG repeats in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). The goal of this study, therefore, was to test the plausibility of an RNA gain-of-function component in the pathogenesis of HDL2. Methods: The presence and composition of RNA foci in frontal cortex from HDL2, Huntington's disease, DM1, and control brains were investigated by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. An untranslatable JPH3 transcript containing either a normal or an expanded CUG repeat was engineered and expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 and HT22 cells to further test the toxic RNA hypothesis. The formation of RNA foci and the extent of cell death were quantified. Results: RNA foci resembling DM1 foci were detected in neurons in HDL2 cortex and other brain regions. Similar to DMI, the foci colocalize with muscleblind-like protein 1, and nuclear muscleblind-like protein I in HDL2 cortical neurons is decreased relative to controls. In cell experiments, expression of a JPH3 transcript with an expanded CUG repeat resulted in the formation of RNA foci that colocalized with muscleblind-like protein I and in cell toxicity. Interpretation: These results imply that RNA toxicity may contribute to the pathogenesis of HDL2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available