4.7 Article

The virial mass function of nearby SDSS galaxy clusters

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 657, Issue 1, Pages 183-196

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/510829

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new determination of the cluster mass function and velocity dispersion function in a volume similar to 10(7) h(3) Mpc(-3) using data from the Fourth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to determine virial masses. We use the caustic technique to remove foreground and background galaxies. The cluster virial mass function agrees well with recent estimates from both X-ray observations and cluster richnesses. Our determination of the mass function lies between those predicted by the 1 and 3 year WMAP data. We constrain the cosmological parameters Omega(m) and sigma(8) and find good agreement with WMAP and constraints from other techniques. With the CIRS mass function alone, we estimate Omega(m) = 0.24(-0.09)(+0.14) and sigma(8) = 0.92(-0.19)(+0.24), or sigma(8) 0.84 +/- 0.03 when holding Omega(m) = 0.3 fixed. We also use the WMAP parameters as priors and constrain velocity segregation in clusters. Using the 1 and 3 year results, we infer velocity segregation of sigma(gxy)/sigma(DM) approximate to 0.94 +/- 0.05 or 1.28 +/- 0.06, respectively. The good agreement of various estimates of the cluster mass function shows that it is a useful independent constraint on estimates of cosmological parameters. We compare the velocity dispersion function of clusters to that of early-type galaxies and conclude that clusters comprise the high-velocity end of the velocity dispersion function of dark matter halos. Future studies of galaxy groups are needed to study the transition between dark matter halos containing individual galaxies and those containing systems of galaxies. The evolution of cluster abundances provides constraints on dark energy models; the mass function presented here offers an important low-redshift calibration benchmark.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available