4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Using objective and subjective measures of neighborhood greenness and accessible destinations for understanding walking trips and BMI in Seattle, Washington

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 371-379

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.371

Keywords

walking; vegetation; accessible destinations; satisfaction; prevention research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. Examine the influence of destinations within walking distance of a residence and vegetation on walking trips and. body mass index (BMI). Design. Cross-section at analysis of data from residences with varying accessibility and greenness. Setting. Seattle, Washington. Subjects. Stratified random sample of residents, stratified by accessibility and greenness. Response rate: 17.5 %, 529 respondents. Measures. Accessibility and greenness were measured. objectively 1 1 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Network Analysis and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), respectively. Self-reported, destinations, natural features, walking trips, BMI, and importance of destinations were measured through a postal survey. Results. Objective accessibility were related to walking trips per month (r(2) = .110, p < 0001), as was subjective greenness (r(2) =.051, p <. 0001), although objective measures of actual greenness were not. In areas with high accessibility, BMI was lower in areas that had high NDVI, or more greenness (r(2) =.129428, model p <. 0001; t-test of interaction p = .0257). Low NDVI areas were associated with overestimation of the number of destinations within walking distance (F-1,F- (499) = 11.009, p = .001) Conclusions. Objective and subjective measurements of accessibility and greenness led to an understanding of variation, among walking hips and BMI in different neighborhoods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available