Journal
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 77-88Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1071/EG07006
Keywords
AEM; bathymetry; depth to bedrock; sediment thickness
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Following a successful bathymetric mapping demonstration in a previous study, the potential of airborne EM for seafloor characterisation has been investigated. The sediment thickness inferred from ID inversion of helicopter-borne time-domain electromagnetic (TEM) data has been compared with estimates based on marine seismic studies. Generally, the two estimates of sediment thickness, and hence depth to resistive bedrock, were in reasonable agreement when the seawater was similar to 20 m deep and the sediment was less than similar to 40 m thick,. Inversion of noisy synthetic data showed that recovered models closely resemble the true models, even when the starting model is dissimilar to the true model, in keeping with the uniqueness theorem for EM soundings. The standard deviations associated with shallow seawater depths inferred from noisy synthetic data are about +/- 15% of depth, comparable with the errors of approximately +/- 1 m arising during inversion of real data. The corresponding uncertainty in depth-to-bedrock estimates, based on synthetic data inversion, is of order of +/- 10%. The mean inverted depths of both seawater and sediment inferred from noisy synthetic data are accurate to similar to 1 m, illustrating the improvement in accuracy resulting from stacking. It is concluded that a carefully calibrated airborne TEM system has potential for surveying sediment thickness and bedrock topography, and for characterising seafloor resistivity in shallow coastal waters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available