4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Optimal dose selection of fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults and adolescents

Journal

ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 216-225

Publisher

OCEAN SIDE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/aap.2007.28.2983

Keywords

allergic rhinitis; allergy; clinical trial; corticosteroid; double blind; fluticasone furoate; intranasal; nasal spray; placebo controlled; steroid

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray, administered using a unique side-actuated device, were evaluated in patients >= 12 years of age with seasonal allergic rhinitis to determine the optimal dose. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-con trolled, dose-ranging study was performed on 641 patients who received placebo (n = 128) or fluticasone furoate, 55 mu g (n = 127), 110 mu g (n = 127), 220 mu g (n = 129), or 440 mu g (n = 130), once daily for 2 weeks. Fluticasone furoate was significantly more effective than placebo for mean changes from baseline over the 2-week treatment period in daily reflective total nasal symptom score (primary end point; p < 0.001 each dose vs. placebo), morning predose instantaneous total nasal symptom score (p < 0.001 each dose versus placebo), daily reflective total ocular symptom score (p <= 0.013 each dose versus placebo), and morning predose instantaneous total ocular symptom score (p <= 0.019 for three highest doses versus placebo). The onset of action for fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus placebo was observed 8 hours after the first dose of study medication in the 110 and 440 mu g treatment groups (p <= 0.032). The incidence of adverse events, results of clinical laboratory tests, and changes in 24-hour urinary cortisol values were similar between active treatment groups and placebo. The preliminary profile of fluticasone furoate is that of a rapidly effective therapy that confers 24-hour efficacy for both nasal and ocular symptoms with once-daily dosing. The 110-mu g dose was chosen for phase III development because it achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful results for all efficacy end points and provided the optimal risk-benefit ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available