4.6 Article

Establishing the feasibility of coupled solid-phase extraction-solid-phase derivatization for acidic herbicides

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1143, Issue 1-2, Pages 16-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.12.066

Keywords

acidic herbicides; solid-phase extraction; derivatization; trimethylsilyidiazomethane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significance of this research is that it improves analytical methodology used for organic chemicals in aqueous solutions by establishing the feasibility of heterogeneous chemical derivatization at the liquid-solid interface (i.e., solid-phase reaction or solid-phase derivatization). A solid-phase derivatization method for determining chlorinated herbicide acids was developed. Solid-phase extraction was used to concentrate and retain analytes on sorbents for subsequent solid-phase derivatization. Background interferences were removed from the chromatograms by electronically subtracting the responses of blank, nonfortified analyses from spiked samples. Two extraction sorbents (octadecyl bonded silica and polystyrene-divinylbenzene) and two derivatizing reagents (BF3-MeOH and trimethylsilyldiazomethane) were investigated. Recovery of 13 chlorinated herbicide acids-including pentachlorophenol, dinoseb, and bentazon (having a derivatizable functional group, -OH or -NH, bonded directly to a phenyl group); dicamba, picloram, acifluorfen, 3,5-dichlorobenzoic acid, and dacthal (having a derivatizable functional group, -COOH, bonded directly to a phenyl group); and 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, dichlorprop, 2,4,5-TP, and 2,4-DB (having a derivatizable functional group, -COOH, bonded directly to a sp(3) carbon atom)-was tested. The analytical method developed was proven successful for determining acidic herbicides, except for the dacthal diacid metabolite, in aqueous samples. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available