4.6 Article

Multiple sequential steps involved in the binding of inhibitors to cytochrome p450 3A4

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 9, Pages 6863-6874

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M610346200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R37 CA090426] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES000267] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytochrome P450 (P450) 3A4 is an extensively studied human enzyme involved in the metabolism of > 50% of drugs. The mechanism of the observed homotropic and heterotropic cooperativity in P450 3A4-catalyzed oxidations is not well understood, and together with the cooperative behavior, a detailed understanding of interaction of drug inhibitors with P450 3A4 is important in predicting clinical drug-drug interactions. The interactions of P450 3A4 with several structurally diverse inhibitors were investigated using both kinetic and thermodynamic approaches to resolve the steps involved in binding of these ligands. The results of pre-steady-state absorbance and fluorescence experiments demonstrate that inhibitor binding is clearly a multistep process, even more complex than the binding of substrates. Based on spectrophotometric equilibrium binding titrations as well as isothermal titration calorimetry experiments, the stoichiometry of binding appears to be 1:1 in the concentration ranges studied. Using a sequential-mixing stopped-flow approach, we were also able to show that the observed multiphasic binding kinetics is the result of sequential events as opposed to the existence of multiple enzyme populations in dynamic equilibrium that interact with ligands at different rates. We propose a three-step minimal model for inhibitor binding, developed with kinetic simulations, consistent with our previously reported model for the binding of substrates, although it is possible that even more steps are involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available