4.3 Article

The human 'pitch center' responds differently to iterated noise and Huggins pitch

Journal

NEUROREPORT
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 323-327

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32802b70ce

Keywords

auditory; binaural dichotic pitch; functional imaging; monaural diotic pitch

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U135079238] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_U135079238] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U135079238] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

dA magnetoencephalographic marker for pitch analysis (the pitch onset response) has been reported for different types of pitchevoking stimuli, irrespective of whether the acoustic cues for pitch are monaurally or binaurally produced. It is claimed that the pitch onset response reflects a common cortical representation for pitch, putatively in lateral Heschl's gyrus. The result of this functional MRI study sheds doubt on this assertion. We report a direct comparison between iterated ripple noise and Huggins pitch in which we reveal a different pattern of auditory cortical activation associated with each pitch stimulus, even when individual variability in structure-function relations is accounted for. Our results suggest it may be premature to assume that lateral Heschl's gyrus is a universal pitch center.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available