4.7 Article

Sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation in anoxic confined aquifers in the northeastern Osaka Basin, Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 335, Issue 1-2, Pages 55-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.033

Keywords

sulfur isotopic composition; confined groundwater; Rayleigh distillation model; Redox reactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used delta S-34 values and chemical compositions of groundwater to investigate the influence of sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation processes in a confined aquifer system in the northeastern Osaka Basin (NEOB), central Japan. Shallow confined groundwater (< 100 m) in the basin is recharged mainly from mountainous areas to the north, and flows south and southwest through the aquifer system. Anion composition of the groundwater is dominated by HCO3- throughout the basin. However, concentrations of redox-sensitive species such as dissolved oxygen, NO3-, Fe2+, and Mn2+ show that groundwater conditions become increasingly anoxic along the flowpaths. Moreover, SO4/(SO4+2HCO(3)) molar ratios decrease with increasing delta S-34 along the flowpaths, which demonstrates that sulfate is reduced in the NEOB aquifer system. Groundwater with both high total dissolved solids and high SO4 content was observed mainly in areas down-flow from faults. Because of the high SO4 content, the anion composition of this groundwater cannot be adequately explained by a simple sulfate reduction process. A Rayleigh distillation model with epsilon = -20 parts per thousand, which allows for sulfide oxidation within marine sediments in proximity to faults, explains the chemistry of all groundwater samples, including those with high SO4 content. The model demonstrates that 76% of initial sulfate is reduced at maximum, and that reduced SO42- content is up to 48.5 mg/L after sulfide oxidation in the NEOB aquifer system. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available