4.7 Article

Scaling and instability of a junction vortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 574, Issue -, Pages 1-23

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006003879

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper details experiments in the region where an impulsively started moving wall slides under a stationary wall. The experiments were conducted over a Reynolds number range of Re-Gamma = 5 x 10(2)-5 x 10(5). The length scale for the Reynolds number is defined as the distance the wall has moved from rest and increases during an experiment. Experiments show that for Re-Gamma > 10(3) a vortex forms close to the junction where the moving wall meets the stationary one. The data shows that while the vortical structure is small, in relation to the fixed-apparatus length scale, the size of the vortex normalized with respect to the wall speed and viscosity scales in a universal fashion with respect to Re-Gamma. The scaling rate is proportional to t(5/6) when the Reynolds number is large. The kinematic behaviour of the vortex is related to the impulse that the moving wall applies to the fluid and results in a prediction that the transient structure should grow as t(5/6) and the velocity field should scale as t(-1/6). The spatial-growth prediction is in good agreement with the experimental results and the velocity scaling is moderately successful in collapsing the experimental data. For Re-Gamma > 2 x 10(4) three-dimensional instabilities appear on the perimeter of the vortical structure and the flow transitions from an unsteady two-dimensional flow to a strongly three-dimensional vortical structure at Re-Gamma similar or equal to 4 x 10(4). The instability mechanism is centrifugal. The formation and growth of these instability structures and their ingestion into the primary vortex core causes the three-dimensional breakdown of the primary vortex. Two movies are available with the online version of the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available