4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the determination of three barbiturates in pork by ion trap gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) following microwave assisted derivatization

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 586, Issue 1-2, Pages 399-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.12.003

Keywords

barbiturates; ultrasonic extraction; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; microwave assisted derivatization; gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; pork

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method was developed for the rapid screening and confirmation analysis of barbital, amobarbital and phenobarbital residues in pork by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) with ion trap MSD. The residual barbiturates in pork were extracted by ultrasonic extraction, cleaned up on a multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) packed solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge and applied acetone-ethyl acetate (3:7, v/v) mixture as eluting solvent and derivatized With CH3I under microwave irradiation. The methylated barbiturates were separated on a TR-5MS capillary column and detected with an ion trap mass detector. Electron impact ion source (El) operating MS/MS mode was adopted for identification and external standard method was employed for quantification. One precursor ion m/z. 169 was selected for analysis of barbital and amobarbital and m/z 232 was selected for phenobarbital. The product ions were obtained under 1.0 V excitation voltage. Good linearities (linear coefficient R > 0.99) were obtained at the range of 0.5-50 mu g kg(-1). Limit of detection (LOD) of barbital was 0.2 mu g kg(-1) and that of amobarbital and phenobarbital were both 0.1 mu gkg(-1) (S/N >= 3). Limit of qualification (LOQ) was 0.5 mu g kg(-1) for three barbiturates (S/N >= 10). Satisfying recoveries ranging from 75% to 96% of the three barbiturates spiked in pork were obtained, with relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) in the range of 2.1-7.8%. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available