4.7 Article

Voxel-based study of structural changes in first-episode patients with bipolar disorder

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 776-781

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.042

Keywords

bipolar disorder; brain; MRI; neurodevelopment; prefrontal cortex; voxel-based morphometry

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH58170, MH63373, MH64086] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although morphometric studies of bipolar disorder (BD) suggest that neurofunctional abnormalities reflect underlying structural changes, it remains unclear whether abnormalities are present at illness onset or reflect disease progression. Previous voxel-based morphometry (VBM) findings suggest that ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) changes develop over time, whereas morphologic abnormalities elsewhere in the anterior limbic network (ALN) are present early in BD. In this study, we used VBM to explore structural brain changes in first-episode bipolar patients. Methods: First-episode bipolar (n = 33) and healthy (n = 33) subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Images were normalized and compared on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Results: Bipolar subjects showed no change in VLPFC density or volume. We observed increased volume in left thalamus and fusiform and cerebellum bilaterally; increased gray matter density in anterior cingulate and posterior parietal structures; and increased gray matter volume and density in middle/superior temporal and posterior cingulate gyri. No areas of decreased volume or density were observed. Conclusions: These data indicate that structural changes are absent from VLPFC early in the course of BD. Morphologic abnormalities are present in other portions of the ALN and in structures previously observed to mediate neurofunctional changes in BD, Suggesting that dysfunctional neuronal proliferation or pruning may occur in bipolar patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available