4.7 Article

Segment specificity of load signal processing depends on walking direction in the stick insect leg muscle control system

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 3285-3294

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5202-06.2007

Keywords

walking direction; campaniform sensilla; sensory feedback; pattern generation; locomotion; reflex reversal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

terrestrial locomotion, sensory feedback from load sensors is important for altering ongoing motor output on a step-by-step basis. We investigated the influence of load signals from the leg on motoneuron pools of the thorax-coxa (ThC) joint in the stick insect walking system. Load sensors were stimulated during rhythmic, alternating activity in protractor coxae (ProCx) and retractor coxae (RetCx) motoneuron pools. Alternating activity in the segment of interest was induced by mechanical stimulation of the animal or pharmacological activation of the isolated thoracic ganglia. Load signals from the legs altered the timing of ThC motoneuron activity by resetting and entraining the activity of the central rhythm generating network of the ThC joint. In the front and middle legs, load signals induced or promoted RetCx activity and decreased or terminated ProCx activity. In the hindleg, reverse transitions were elicited, with increasing load terminating RetCx and initiating ProCx activity. Studies in semi-intact walking animals showed that the effect of load on the ThC-joint motoneurons depended on walking direction, with increased load promoting the functional stance phase motoneuron pool (in forward walking, RetCx activity; in backward walking, ProCx activity). Thus, we show that modifications of sensory feedback in a locomotor system are related to walking direction. In a final set of ablation experiments, we show that the load influence is mediated by the three groups of trochanteral campaniform sensilla.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available