4.6 Article

Estimation of nitric oxide concentration in blood for different rates of generation - Evidence that intravascular nitric oxide levels are too low to exert physiological effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 12, Pages 8831-8836

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M611684200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-65608, HL-63744, HL-38324] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is a potent vasodilator in the cardiovascular system. Several lines of experimental evidence suggest that NO or NO equivalents may also be generated in the blood. However, blood contains a large amount of hemoglobin (Hb) in red blood cells (RBCs). The RBC-encapsulated Hb can react very quickly with NO, which is only limited by the rate of NO diffusion into the RBCs. It is unclear what the possible NO concentration levels in blood are and how the NO diffusion coefficient (D) and the permeability (P-m) of RBC membrane to NO affect the level of NO concentration. In this study, a steady-state concentration experimental method combined with a spherical diffusion model are presented for determining D and P-m and examining the effect of NO generation rate (V-o) and hematocrit (Hct) on NO concentration. It was determined that P-m is 4.5 +/- 1.5 cm/s and D is 3410 +/- 50 mu m(2)/s at 37 degrees C. Simulations based on experimental parameters show that, when the rate of NO formation is as high as 100 nM/s, the maximal NO concentration in blood is below 0.012 nM at P-m = 4.5 cm/s and Hct = 45%. Thus, it is unlikely that NO is directly exported or generated from the RBC as an intravascular signaling molecule, because its concentration would be too low to exert a physiological role. Furthermore, our results suggest that, if RBCs export NO bioactivity, this would be through NO-derived species that can release or form NO rather than NO itself.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available