4.8 Article

Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus - The Framingham Heart Study

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages 1544-1550

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658948

Keywords

diabetes mellitus; cardiovascular diseases; epidemiology; risk factors

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-25195] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [5K24H004334] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Marked reductions in cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality have occurred in the United States over the last 50 years. We tested the hypothesis that the relative burden of CVD attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM) has increased over the past 5 decades. Methods and Results-Participants aged 45 to 64 years from the Framingham Heart Study, who attended examinations in an early time period (1952 to 1974), were compared with those who attended examinations in a later time period (1975 to 1998). The risk of CVD events (n = 133 among those with and 1093 among those without DM) attributable to DM in the 2 time periods was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models; population attributable risk of DM as a CVD risk factor was calculated for each time period. The age-and sex-adjusted hazard ratio for DM as a CVD risk factor was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.9) in the earlier time period and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.2) in the later time period. The population attributable risk for DM as a CVD risk factor increased from 5.4% (95% CI, 3.8% to 6.9%) in the earlier time period to 8.7% (95% CI, 5.9% to 11.4%) in the later time period (P for attributable risk ratio = 0.04), although multivariable adjustment resulted in attenuation of these findings (P = 0.12); most of these observations were found among men. Conclusions-The proportion of CVD attributable to DM has increased over the past 50 years in Framingham. These findings emphasize the need for increased efforts to prevent DM and to aggressively treat and control CVD risk factors among those with DM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available