4.7 Article

Absence of normal photic integration in the circadian visual system: Response to millisecond light flashes

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages 3375-3382

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5496-06.2007

Keywords

suprachiasmatic; intergeniculate; pregeniculate; retina; photoreceptor; retinohypothalamic tract

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH064471-04, MH64471, R01 MH064471] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS022168, NS22168, R01 NS022168-21] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light is the most prominent synchronizing stimulus for circadian rhythms. The circadian visual system responds in accordance with the energy content of photic stimuli longer than a few seconds. Here, as few as three flashes (2 ms each delivered to hamsters over 5 or 60 min at circadian time 19) elicited large phase advances. Ten or more flashes were required to induce FOS protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and such induction occurred throughout the entire SCN, as well as outside the nucleus. High-density flash stimulation (0.5 s interflash interval) was ineffective, but response increased as the interval increased up to 4 s. In an irradiance response test, phase shifts appeared to be all-or-none with threshold irradiance between 140 and 1070 mu W/cm(2), implying lack of stimulus energy summation. Nevertheless, an irradiance ineffective when delivered as 10 flashes induced phase shifts when given as 100 flashes, but the response was substantially smaller than elicited by 10 flashes, each with similar to 1 log unit more irradiance. The results also show reduced sensitivity of flash-induced FOS response in the intergeniculate leaflet compared with the SCN, contrary to studies using longer light stimuli. Masking was robust and prolonged in response to 10 flashes. The data demonstrate that the circadian visual system responds markedly to brief, intense light stimuli without normal photic integration. This may involve a second input pathway different from that mediating the effects of longer, dimmer photic stimuli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available