4.6 Article

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and their high-frequency oscillations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 877-886

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.12.001

Keywords

somatosensory evoked potential; high-frequency oscillation; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate sensory cortical changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we studied somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and their high-frequency oscillation potentials. Methods: Subjects were 15 healthy volunteers and 26 ALS patients. Median nerve SEPs were recorded and several peaks of oscillations were obtained by digitally filtering raw SEPs. The patients were sorted into three groups according to the level of weakness of abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB): mild, moderate and severe. The latencies and amplitudes of main and oscillation components of SEP were compared among normal subjects and the three patient groups. Results: The early cortical response was enlarged in the moderate weakness group, while it was attenuated in the severe weakness group. No differences were noted in the size ratios of oscillations to the main SEP component between the patients and normal subjects. The central sensory conduction time (CCT) and N20 duration were prolonged in spite of normal other latencies. Conclusions: The median nerve SEP amplitude changes are associated with motor disturbances in ALS. The cortical potential enhancement of SEPs with moderate weakness in ALS may reflect some compensatory function of the sensory cortex for motor disturbances. Significance: The sensory cortical compensation for motor disturbances is shown in ALS, which must be important information for rehabilitation. (c) 2006 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available