4.6 Article

Outcome of multimodal treatment for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A single institution experience

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 402-407

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.04.015

Keywords

oropharyngeal carcinoma; radiotherapy; surgery; survival; multimodal therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical management of patients with primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma remains controversial. The results of a combined approach involving surgery for the primary tumor, neck dissection, and postoperative radiotherapy were reviewed. A retrospective review was carried out for 211 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Overall survival and disease-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (Log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards models) statistical analyses were carried out to investigate the role of clinical factors as significant prognostic markers. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 79.8% and 68.8%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, positive resection margins were the only and independent significant prognostic markers for impaired disease-free survival (Log-rank: p = 0.0238; Cox model: p = 0.045; hazard ratio 2.48 [95% confidence interval 1.02-6.05]). In univariate analysis, mate sex was the only significant negative prognostic factor for overall survival (Log-rank: p = 0.0453), whereas Cox multivariate analysis identified extracapsular spread as an independent prognostics marker (p = 0.049; hazard ratio 1.86 [95% confidence interval 1.00-3.43]). We conclude that the presented multimodal approach of surgery for the primary tumor and the neck followed by postoperative radio(chemo)therapy seems to be superior to non-surgical treatment protocols, as it results in better disease-free and overall survival. To assess this multimodal treatment approach, morbidity and economic considerations need to be further analyzed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available