4.6 Article

Assessment of cortico-spinal tract impairment in multiple system atrophy using transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 815-823

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.004

Keywords

transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor evoked potentials; triple stimulation technique; multiple system atrophy; Parkinson's disease; cortico-spinal tract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Among Parkinsonian syndromes, pyramidal signs suggesting cortico-spinal impairment are a hallmark of multiple system atrophy.(MSA). Although it is crucial to diagnose correctly this disease to choose the appropriate treatment, the available diagnostic criteria lack sensitivity. Cortical excitability patterns assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) do not differentiate Parkinsonian disorders. TMS using triple stimulation technique (TST) accurately detects cortico-spinal impairment. We hypothesized that this technique could detect such impairment in MSA patients. Methods: The TST was applied along with single and paired-pulse TMS to 31 patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for MSA-P (n = 10), MSA-C (n = 4), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP; n = 6) and Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD; n = 11) and I I control subjects. Results: Single and paired-pulse TMS patterns did not differ between any patient group. The TST pattern was abnormal in five MSA-P, one MSA-C and one PSP patients but not in IPD patients or controls. The mean TST ratio for MSA-P (86.6%) was significantly different from IPD (99.1%; p < 0.05) whereas ratios for MSA-C (92.1%) and PSP (93.3%) were not different from IPD or controls (99.5%). Conclusions: These results suggest that TST is effective to assess cortico-spinal impairment in MSA. Significance: TST might be useful for the diagnosis of atypical Parkinsonism. (c) 2007 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available