Journal
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 179-187Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01318.x
Keywords
dental implants; implantoplasty; marginal bone loss; peri-implantitis; radiologic evaluation; resective surgery
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: This clinical study on therapy of peri-implantitis aimed to compare the marginal bone loss of implants treated with different surgical approaches: implantoplasty and peri-implant resective surgery only. Material and methods: Over a period of 6 years, 10 patients (20 implants) were treated with implantoplasty (test group) and 9 had resective surgery (control group). A computerized analysis of radiographs was performed to calculate marginal bone loss (MBL) values mesial and distal to the implants. The measurement system was set by means of known implant sizes. Data on MBL were collected at the time of peri-implantitis diagnosis, 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery. Results: There was no difference between the mean MBL values three years after implantoplasty in the test group: 0 and 0.01 mm of MBL mesial and distal to the implant were found (P > 0.05). Conversely, the mean MBL values recorded in the control group were statistically different: 1.44 and 1.54 mm of MBL mesial and distal to the implant were found (P < 0.05) 3 years after resective surgery. Moreover, the variation of peri-implant marginal bone after peri-implantitis surgical treatment was significantly lower in the test group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this radiographic research suggested that implantoplasty was an effective treatment of peri-implant infections and peri-implantitis progression.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available