4.8 Article

Effect of a fullerene water suspension on bacterial phospholipids and membrane phase behavior

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 2636-2642

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es062181w

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several fullerene-based nanomaterials generate reactive oxygen species that can damage cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of buckminsterfullerene (C-60) introduced as colloidal aggregates in water (nC(60)) on bacterial membrane lipid composition and phase behavior. Pseudomonas putida (Gram-negative) and Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive) responded to nC(60) by altering membrane lipid composition, phase transition temperature, and membrane fluidity. P. putida decreased its levels of unsaturated fatty acids and increased the proportions of cyclopropane fatty acids in the presence of nC(60), possibly to protect the bacterial membrane from oxidative stress. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurement of intact bacterial cells showed slightly increased phase transition temperatures (T-m) and increased membrane fluidity for cells grown in the presence of high, growth-inhibiting concentrations (0.5 mg L-1) of nC(60). B. subtilis responded to a low dose of nC(60) (0.01 mg L-1) by significantly increasing the levels of iso- and anteiso-branched fatty acids (from 5.8 to 31.5% and 12.9 to 32.3% of total fatty acids, respectively) and to a high, growth-inhibiting concentration of nC(60) (0.75 mg L-1) by increasing synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids. In contrast to P. putida, B. subtilis response was a decrease in T-m and an increase in membrane fluidity. These findings represent the first demonstrated physiological adaptation response of bacteria to a manufactured nanomaterial, and they show that response in lipid composition and membrane phase behavior depends on both the nC(60) concentration and the cell wall morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available