4.8 Article

Biochemical and cellular characteristics of the 3′→5′ exonuclease TREX2

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 2682-2694

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm151

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA76317-05A1, R01 CA123203, T32 CA086800, T32 CA86800-03, R01 CA076317] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG017242, P01 AG17242] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [U01 ES011044, UO1 ES11044] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TREX2 is an autonomous nonprocessive 3 ' -> 5 ' exonuclease, suggesting that it maintains genome integrity. To investigate TREX2s biochemical and cellular properties, we show that endogenous TREX2 is expressed widely in mouse tissues and human cell lines. Unexpectedly, endogenous human TREX2 is predominantly expressed as a 30-kDa protein (not 26 kDa, as previously believed), which is likely encoded by longer isoforms (TREX2(L1) and/or TREX2(L2)) that possess similar capacity for self-association, DNA binding and catalytic activity. Site-directed mutagenesis analysis shows that the three functional activities of TREX2 are distinct, yet integrated. Mutation of amino acids putatively important for homodimerization significantly impairs both DNA binding and exonuclease activity, while mutation of amino acids (except R163) in the DNA binding and exonuclease domains affects their corresponding activities. Interestingly, however, DNA-binding domain mutations do not impact catalytic activity, while exonuclease domain mutations diminish DNA binding. To understand TREX2 cellular properties, we find endogenous TREX2 is down regulated during G2/M and nuclear TREX2 displays a punctate staining pattern. Furthermore, TREX2 knockdown reduces cell proliferation. Taken together, our results suggest that TREX2 plays an important function during DNA metabolism and cellular proliferation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available