4.6 Article

Oral contraceptives, reproductive factors, and risk of colorectal cancer among women in a prospective cohort study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 7, Pages 794-801

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwk068

Keywords

colorectal cancer; contraceptives; oral; hormones; menarche; menopause; parity; women

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA47988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL43851] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous findings on the associations between oral contraceptive (OC) use and reproductive factors and risk of colorectal cancer have been inconclusive. The authors evaluated associations of OC use and reproductive factors (including parity, age at first birth, age at menarche, and age at menopause) with risk of colorectal cancer among women in a large-scale prospective cohort study. The analysis included 39,680 participants in the Women's Health Study who had usable information on ever use of OCs and potential risk factors for colorectal cancer. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models. All p values were two-sided. During an average of 11 years of follow-up (1992-2004), 267 incident cases of colorectal cancer were documented. Ever use of OCs was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer (relative risk = 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.50, 0.89). Women who had used OCs for 6 months-< 3 years had a relative risk of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.40, 0.94) relative to never users, with little additional decreased risk being seen with longer duration of use (p for multivariate trend = 0.09). No significant association was observed between reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk. These findings provide some support for a potential role of OCs in reducing risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available