4.5 Article

Protective effects of citrus nobiletin and auraptene in transgenic rats developing adenocarcinoma of the prostate (TRAP) and human prostate carcinoma cells

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 471-477

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00417.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dietary phytochemicals, including nobiletin and auraptene, have been shown to exert inhibiting effects in several chemically induced carcinogenesis models. We here investigated the influence of nobiletin and auraptene on prostate carcinogenesis using transgenic rats developing adenocarcinoma of the prostate (TRAP) bearing the SV40 T antigen transgene under control of the probasin promoter and human prostate cancer cells. Starting at 5 weeks of age, male TRAP rats received powder diet containing 500 p.p.m. nobiletin or auraptene, or the basal diet for 15 weeks and then were sacrificed for analysis of serum testosterone levels and histological changes. The body and relative prostate weights and serum testosterone levels did not differ among the groups. Since all animals developed prostate carcinomas, these were semiquantitatively measured and expressed as relative areas of prostate epithelial cells. Nobiletin caused significant reduction in the ventral (P < 0.01), lateral (P < 0.001) and dorsal (P < 0.05) prostate lobes, while decreasing high grade lesions (P < 0.05) in the ventral and lateral lobes. Feeding of auraptene also effectively reduced the epithelial component (P < 0.05) and high grade lesions (P < 0.05), in the lateral prostate. A further experiment demonstrated that growth of androgen sensitive LNCaP and androgen insensitive DU145 and PC3 human prostate cancer cells, was suppressed by both nobiletin and to a lesser extent auraptene in a dose-dependent manner, with significant increase in apoptosis. In conclusion, these compounds, particularly nobiletin, may be valuable for prostate cancer prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available