4.8 Article

Tumor-specific cooperation of retinoblastoma protein family and Snf5 inactivation

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 7, Pages 3002-3009

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4207

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA091048, R01CA046283, R01CA113794] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) are rare aggressive cancers that occur in young children. Seventy-five percent of sporadic MRTs harbor inactivating SNF5 mutations, and mice heterozygous for an Snf5-null allele develop MRTs with partial penetrance. The diagnosis of choroid plexus carcinomas (CPC) in addition to MRTs in families with a single mutant SNF5 allele prompted us to assess the role of SNF5 loss in CPC in genetically engineered mice. With high frequency, TgT(121) mice develop CPCs that are initiated by inactivation of retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and related proteins p107 and p130. However, CPC penetrance and latency were not significantly affected by SnF5 heterozygosity, consistent with recent evidence that CPCs in SNF5 families were, in many cases, misdiagnosed MRTs. Surprisingly, although the CPC phenotype was unaffected, TgT(121);Snf5(+/-) mice developed MRTs with increased penetrance and decreased latency compared with TgT(121);Snf5(+/-) littermates. MRTs expressed the T-121 protein with a concomitant increase in mitotic activity. The predominant appearance of TgT(121);Snf5(+/-) MRTs in the spinal cord led to the discovery that these tumors likely arose from a subset of spinal cord neural progenitor cells expressing T-121 rather than from transdifferentiation of CPC. Significantly, the target cell type(s) for the MRT is unknown. Hence, this study not only shows that pRb(f) and SNF5 inactivation cooperate to induce MRTs but also provides new insight into the MRT target population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available