4.7 Article

The therapeutic potential of hepatocyte growth factor to sensitize ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin and paclitaxel in vivo

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 2191-2198

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1915

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Advanced ovarian cancers are initially responsive to combinatorial chemotherapy with platinum drugs and taxanes but, in most cases, develop drug resistance. We recently showed that, in vitro, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) enhances death of human ovarian cancer cell lines treated with cisplatin (CDDP) and paclitaxel. The present study addresses whether in vivo HGF makes ovarian carcinoma cells more responsive to these chemotherapeutics. Experimental Design: Using Lentiviral vectors carrying the HGF transgene, we transduced SK-OV-3 and NIH:OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma cell lines to obtain stable autocrine and paracrine HGF receptor activation. In vitro, we assayed growth, motility, invasiveness, and the response to CDDP and paclitaxel of the HGF-secreting bulk unselected cell populations. In vivo, we tested the cytotoxic effects of the drugs versus s.c. tumors formed by the wild-type and HGF-secreting cells in immunocompromised mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with CDDP (i.p.) and paclitaxel (i.v.), combined in different schedules and doses. Results: In vitro, HGF-secreting cells did not show altered proliferation rates and survival but were strongly sensitized to the death triggered by CDDP and paclitaxel, alone or in combination. In vivo, we found a therapeutic window in which autocrine/paracrine HGF made tumors sensitive to low doses of the drugs, which were ineffective on their own. Conclusions: These data provide the proof-of-concept that in vivo gene therapy with HGF might be competent in sensitizing ovarian cancer cells to conventional chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available