4.5 Article

BAFF and LPS cooperate to induce B cells to become susceptible to CD95/Fas-mediated cell death

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 990-1000

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200636698

Keywords

APRIL; BAFF; B cells; Fas-mediated apoptosis; LPS

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00166] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI45088] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37905] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microorganisms with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) activate B cells directly by binding to TLR and also indirectly by inducing APC to release cytokines such as BAFF that promote B cell survival. We found that murine B cells activated concomitantly with LPS (TLR-4 ligand) and BAFF are protected from spontaneous apoptosis, but are more susceptible to Fas/CD95-mediated cell death. This increased susceptibility to Fas-induced apoptosis is associated with a dramatic coordinated upregulation of Fas/CD95 and IRF-4 expression through a mechanism mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway. Up-regulation of Fas/CD95 by BAFF is restricted to B cells activated through TLR-4, but not through TLR-9, BCR or CD40. TLR ligands differ in the BAFF family receptors (R) they induce on B cells: BAFF-R is increased by the TLR4 ligand, LPS, but not by the TLR9 ligand, CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides, which, in contrast, strongly up-regulates transmembrane activator and CAML interactor (TACI). This suggests the up-regulation of Fas by BAFF is mediated by BAFF-R and not by TACI. Consistently, APRIL, which binds to TACI and B cell maturation antigen but not BAFF-R, did not enhance Fas expression on LPS-activated B cells. Increased susceptibility to Fas-mediated killing of B cells activated with LPS and BAFF may be a fail-safe mechanism to avoid overexpansion of nonspecific or autoreactive B cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available