3.9 Article

Avidity of the immunoglobulin g response to a Neissetia meningitidis group C polysaccharide conjugate vaccine as measured by inhibition and chaotropic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

Journal

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 397-403

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00241-06

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibody avidity, the strength of the multivalent interaction between antibodies and their antigens, is an important characteristic of protective immune responses. We have developed an inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure antibody avidity for the capsular polysaccharide (PS) of Neisseria meningitidis group C (MnC) and determined the avidity constants (K(D)s) for 100 sera from children immunized with an MnC PS conjugate vaccine. The avidity constants were compared to the avidity indices (AI) obtained for the same sera using a chaotropic ELISA protocol. After the primary immunization series, the geometric mean (GM) K-D was 674 nM and did not change in the months following immunization. However, the GM avidity did increase after the booster dose (GM K-D, 414 nM 1 month after booster immunization). In contrast, the GM AI increased from an initial value of 118 after the primary immunization series to 147 6 months after the completion of the primary immunization series and then further increased to 178 after booster immunization. At the individual subject level, the avidity constant and AI correlated after the primary immunization series and after booster immunization but not prior to boosting. This work suggests that the AI, as measured by the chaotropic ELISA, in contrast to the K-D, reflects changes that render antibody populations less susceptible to disruption by chaotropic agents without directly affecting the strength of the binding interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available