4.3 Article

Effect of two different intense training regimens on skeletal muscle ion transport proteins and fatigue development

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00251.2006

Keywords

muscle metabolites; Na+/ K+ pump; intermittent exercise performance; monocarboxylate transporter; Na+/ H+ exchanger

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effect of two different intense exercise training regimens on skeletal muscle ion transport systems, performance, and metabolic response to exercise. Thirteen subjects performed either sprint training [ ST; 6-s sprints ( n = 6)], or speed endurance training [ SET; 30-s runs similar to 130% V-O2 max, n = 7]. Training in the SET group provoked higher ( P < 0.05) plasma K+ levels and muscle lactate/H+ accumulation. Only in the SET group was the amount of the Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1 ( 31%) and Na+-K+-ATPase isoform alpha(2) ( 68%) elevated ( P < 0.05) after training. Both groups had higher ( P < 0.05) levels of Na+-K+-ATPase beta(1)-isoform and monocarboxylate transporter 1 ( MCT1), but no change in MCT4 and Na+-K+-ATPase alpha(1)-isoform. Both groups had greater ( P < 0.05) accumulation of lactate during exhaustive exercise and higher ( P < 0.05) rates of muscle lactate decrease after exercise. The ST group improved ( P < 0.05) sprint performance, whereas the SET group elevated ( P < 0.05) performance during exhaustive continuous treadmill running. Improvement in the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test was larger ( P < 0.05) in the SET than ST group ( 29% vs. 10%). Only the SET group had a decrease ( P < 0.05) in fatigue index during a repeated sprint test. In conclusion, turnover of lactate/H+ and K+ in muscle during exercise does affect the adaptations of some but not all related muscle ion transport proteins with training. Adaptations with training do have an effect on the metabolic response to exercise and specific improvement in work capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available