4.5 Article

Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: A pilot study in minipigs

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages 716-722

Publisher

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060285

Keywords

bone morphogenetic proteins; cytokines; dental implants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Most dental implants are positioned using a drilling surgery technique. However, dentistry recently experienced the implementation of piezoelectric surgery. This technique was introduced to overcome some of the limitations involving rotating instruments in bone surgery. This study used biomolecular and histologic analyses to compare the osseointegration of porous implants positioned using traditional drills versus the piezoelectric bone surgery technique. Methods: porous titanium implants were installed into mini-pig tibias. Histomorphology and levels of bone morphogentic protein (BMP)-4, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin -1 beta and -10 were evaluated in the peri-implants osseous samples. Results: Histomorphological analysis demonstrated that more inflammatory cells were present in samples from drilled sites. Also, neo-osteogensis was consistently more active in bone samples from the implant sites that were prepared using piezoelectric bone surgery. Moreover, bone around the implants treated with the piezoelectric bone surgery technique showed an earlier increase in BMP-4 and TGF-beta 2 proteins as well as a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines. Conclusions: Piezoelectric bone surgery appears to be more efficient in the first phases of bone healing; in induced an earlier increase in BMPs, controlled the inflammatory process better, and stimulated bone remodeling as early as 56 days post-treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available