4.4 Article

Role of nitric oxide on pathogenesis of 5-fluorouracil induced experimental oral mucositis in hamster

Journal

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 603-612

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-006-0301-y

Keywords

nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase; 5-fluorouracil; oral mucositis; 1,400 W; aminoguanidine; Np-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mucositis induced by antineoplastic drugs is an important, dose-limiting, and costly side effect of cancer therapy. Aim: To investigate the role of nitric oxide (NO) on the pathogenesis of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced oral mucositis. Oral mucositis was induced by two intraperitoneal (i.p) administrations of 5-FU on the first and second days of the experiment (60 and 40 mg/kg, respectively) in male hamsters. Animals were treated subcutaneously with saline (0.4 ml), 1,400 W (1 mg/kg), aminoguanidine (5 or 10 mg/kg) or N phi-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) 1 h before the injections of 5-FU and daily until sacrifice, on the tenth day. Macroscopic and histopathological analyses were evaluated and graded. Tissues from the cheek pouches were harvested for measurement of myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, nitrite level, and immunohistochemistry for induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Treatment with 1,400 W or aminoguanidine reduced macroscopic and histological parameters of oral mucositis, and reduced the inflammatory cell infiltration as detected by histopathology and by MPO activity. In contrast, the administration of L-NAME did not significantly reverse the inflammatory alterations induced by experimental mucositis. Increased NOS activity, nitrite level and immunostaining for iNOS were detected on the check pouch tissue of animals submitted to 5-FU-induced oral mucositis on the tenth day. These results suggest an important role of NO produced by iNOS in the pathogenesis of oral mucositis induced by 5-FU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available