4.7 Article

Salt stress response in tomato beyond the salinity tolerance threshold

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 276-282

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.02.002

Keywords

abscisic acid; hydroponic system; ion content; Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.; osmotic stress; root-shoot ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crop salt tolerance is generally assessed as the relative yield response to increasing root zone salinity, expressed as soil (ECe) or irrigation water (ECw) electrical conductivity. Alternatively, the dynamic process of salt accumulation into the shoot relative to the shoot biomass has also been considered as a tolerance index. These relationships are graphically represented by two intersecting linear regions, which identify (1) a specific threshold tolerance, at which yield begins to decrease, and (2) a declining region, which defines the yield reduction rate. Although the salinity threshold is intuitively a critical parameter for establishing plant salt tolerance, we focused our interest on physiological modifications that may occur in the plant at salinity higher than the so-called tolerance threshold. For this purpose, we exposed hydroponically grown tomato plants to eight different salinity levels (EC = 2.5 (non-salinized control); 4.2; 6.0; 7.8; 9.6; 11.4; 13.2; 15.0 dS m(-1)). Based on biomass production, water relations, leaf ions accumulation, leaf and root abscisic acid and stomatal conductance measurements, we were able to identify a specific EC value (approximately 9.6 dS m(-1)) at which a sharp increase of the shoot and root ABA levels coincided with (1) a decreased sensitivity of stomatal response to ABA; (2) a different partitioning of Na+ ions between young and mature leaves; (3) a remarkable increase of the root-to-shoot ratio. The specificity and functional significance of this response in salt stress adaptation is discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available