4.0 Article

Fragmentation of mitochondrial large subunit rRNA in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella and the evolution of rRNA structure in alveolate mitochondria

Journal

PROTIST
Volume 158, Issue 2, Pages 239-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.12.002

Keywords

alveolata; dinoflagellate; rRNA fragmentation; mitochondrial LSU rRNA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive investigations on apicomplexan mitochondria, such as those of Plasmodium falciparum, revealed that ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are fragmented into multiple short pieces. In this study, we isolated three mitochondrial large subunit rRNA (mtLSU rRNA) fragments from the dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella. A piece of mtLSU rRNA that possesses high sequence similarity to the P. falciparum LSU rRNA E fragment was identified in a 1.7-kbp mitochondrial (mt) DNA clone. We further confirmed that the A. catenella E-like fragment is indeed transcriptionally active and that the transcript could form appropriate RNA secondary structures. In addition, we identified expression of two additional rRNA fragments with sequence similarities to P. falciparum IF and G fragments. Notably, the 1.7-kbp mt DNA clone contains only one of the three rRNA fragments identified in this study, suggesting that the rRNA fragments are separately encoded in the A. catenella mt genome. Given the sister relationship between apicomplexa and dinoflagellates in eukaryote phylogeny, it is most parsimonious to assume that the mt rRNA fragmentation was established prior to the separation of the two protist groups. However, current sequence data on dinoflagellate mitochondria are insufficient to reject the alternative scenario, in which the rRNA fragmentation evolved independently in apicomplexan and dinoflagellate mitochondria. (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available