4.7 Article

Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of α-helical antimicrobial peptides

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 1398-1406

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00925-06

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25 CA154015] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI048717, R01AI48717, R37 AI015940, R01 AI015940, AI15940] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM061855, R01GM61855] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the 26-residue amphipathic a-helical antimicrobial peptide V13K(L) (Y. Chen et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:12316-12329, 2005) was used as the framework to study the effects of peptide hydrophobicity on the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides. Hydrophobicity was systematically decreased or increased by replacing leucine residues with less hydrophobic alanine residues or replacing alanine residues with more hydrophobic leucine residues on the nonpolar face of the helix, respectively. Hydrophobicity of the nonpolar face of the amphipathic helix was demonstrated to correlate with peptide helicity (measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy) and self-associating ability (measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography temperature profiling) in aqueous environments. Higher hydrophobicity was correlated with stronger hemolytic activity. In contrast, there was an optimum hydrophobicity window in which high antimicrobial activity could be obtained. Decreased or increased hydrophobicity beyond this window dramatically decreased antimicrobial activity. The decreased antimicrobial activity at high peptide hydrophobicity can be explained by the strong peptide self-association which prevents the peptide from passing through the cell wall in prokaryotic cells, whereas increased peptide self-association had no effect on peptide access to eukaryotic membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available