4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

In situ synchrotron-radiation XRF study of REE phosphate dissolution in aqueous fluids to 800 °C

Journal

LITHOS
Volume 95, Issue 1-2, Pages 87-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.07.017

Keywords

rare-earth phosphate-aqueous fluid interactions; dissolution kinetics; REE patterns; Th/Pb ratios; in situ SR-XRF analysis; hydrothermal diamond-anvil cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temporal evolution of the concentrations of La, Cc, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Y, Pb, Th, and U in the fluid during dissolution of synthetic LaPO4 monazite, natural monazite, and xenotime in aqueous HCl +/- NaCl solutions was studied in situ at temperatures from 25 to 800 degrees C and pressures to about 2 GPa using hydrothennal diamond-anvil cells and synchrotron-radiation XRF analyses. Constant (within error) La concentrations in the fluid were attained in less than 50 min at temperatures >= 300 degrees C and in less than 90 min at 200 degrees C. At 100 degrees C, the time required to reach a constant La concentration varied with the HCl molality from less than 3 h at 5.1 m HCl to >= 11 h at 1 m HCl. The experiments indicate a significantly lower mobility of Y, Gd, and Th compared to that of the LREE, particularly La, over a large range of crustal P-T conditions if controlled by interaction of monazite with acidic and chloridic fluids. The corresponding change in the REE pattern is in close agreement with literature reports on natural monazites, which underwent greisenization or sericitization. The Th/Pb ratio in the fluid increased with temperature and HCl concentration, but was far below the Th/Pb ratio in the monazite even at 600 degrees C and 2 GPa. The experimental results imply that monazites leached in acidic and chloridie fluids are characterized by a strong enrichment of Th relative to the LREE and Pb. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available