4.6 Article

Increased Diaphragmatic Contribution to Inspiratory Effort during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance versus Pressure Support An Electromyographic Study

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 1028-1036

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000432

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Association pour le Developpement et l'Organisation de la Recherche en Pneumologie et sur le Sommeil (ADOREPS), Paris, France
  2. French Government Investissement d'Avenir Agence Nationale de Recherche-10-Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire 06 program, Paris, France
  3. Annee-Recherche scholarship from the Agence Regional de Sante Ile-de-France, Paris, France
  4. French Intensive Care Society (SRLF), Paris, France
  5. Fonds de dotation Recherche en Sante Respiratoire, Paris, France
  6. College des Enseignants de Reanimation Medicale, Paris, France
  7. Fonds d'Etudes et de Recherche du Corps Medical, Paris, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), regulated exclusively by the electromyographic activity (EA) of the diaphragm (EAdi), could affect the distribution of neural drive to the various inspiratory muscles. The objective of this study was to compare EAdi, EA of the scalene (EAscal), and EA of the alae nasi (EAan), according to the ventilatory mode and assist level in 12 mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: Seven assist levels of pressure support ventilation (PSV) and NAVA were sequentially applied. EAdi, EAscal, and EAan were quantified and expressed as a percentage of their maximum values. The relative contributions of extradiaphragmatic muscles to inspiratory efforts were assessed by calculating EAscal/EAdi and EAan/EAdi ratios. Three assist levels for each of the two ventilatory modes that resulted in EAdi values of 80 to 100%, 60 to 80%, and 40 to 60% were assigned to three groups (N1, N2, and N3). Results are expressed as median and interquartile range. Results: EA of inspiratory muscles decreased during PSV and NAVA (P < 0.0001). Although EAdi remained constant within groups (P = 0.9), EAscal was reduced during NAVA compared with PSV in N1 and N3 (65% [62 to 64] and 27% [18 to 34] in NAVA vs. 90% [81 to 100] and 49% [40 to 55] in PSV, P = 0.007). Altogether, EAscal/EAdi and EAan/EAdi ratios were lower in NAVA than PSV (0.7 [0.6 to 0.7] and 0.7 [0.6 to 0.8] in NAVA vs. 0.9 [0.8 to 1.1] and 0.9 [0.7 to 1.1] in PSV, P < 0.05). Conclusions: NAVA and PSV both reduced extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscle activity, in proportion to the level of assistance. Compared with PSV, NAVA resulted in a predominant contribution of the diaphragm to inspiratory effort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available