4.7 Article

Reduction of chromate from electroplating wastewater from pH 1 to 2 using fluidized zero valent iron process

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 142, Issue 1-2, Pages 362-367

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.029

Keywords

fluidized bed; zero valent iron; chromate; electroplating wastewater; XRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluidized zero valent iron (ZVI) process was conducted to reduce hexavalent chromium (chromate, CrO42-) to trivalent chromium (Cr3+) from electroplating wastewater due to the following reasons: (1) Extremely low pH (1-2) for the electroplating wastewater favoring the ZVI reaction. (2) The ferric ion, produced from the reaction of Cr(VI) and ZVI, can act as a coagulant to assist the precipitation of Cr(OH)(3(s)) to save the coagulant cost. (3) Higher ZVI utilization for fluidized process due to abrasive motion of the ZVI. For influent chromate concentration of 418 mg/L as Cr6+, pH 2 and ZVI dosage of 3 g (41 g/L), chromate removal was only 29% with hydraulic detention time (HRT) of 1.2 min, but was increased to 99.9% by either increasing HRT to 5.6 min or adjusting pH to 1.5. For iron species at pH 2 and HRT of 1.2 min, Fe3+ was more thermodynamically stable since oxidizing agent chromate was present. However, if pH was adjusted to 1.5 or 1, where chromate was completely removed, high Fe2+ but very low Fe3+ was present. It can be explained that ZVI reacted with chromate to produce Fe2+ first and the presence of chromate would keep converting Fe2+ to Fe3+. Therefore, Fe2+ is an indicator for complete reduction from Cr(VI) to Cr(III). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted to exam the remained species at pH 2. ZVI, iron oxide and iron sulfide were observed, indicating the formation of iron oxide or iron sulfide could stop the chromate reduction reaction. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available