4.7 Article

On the magnetic flux budget in low-corona magnetic reconnection and interplanetary coronal mass ejections

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 659, Issue 1, Pages 758-772

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/512060

Keywords

solar-terrestrial relations; Sun : activity; Sun : coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Sun : flares; Sun : magnetic fields

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first quantitative comparison between the total magnetic reconnection flux in the low corona in the wake of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the magnetic flux in magnetic clouds (MCs) that reach 1 AU 2-3 days after CME onset. The total reconnection flux is measured from flare ribbons, and the MC flux is computed using in situ observations at 1 AU, all ranging from 10(20) to 10(22) Mx. It is found that for the nine studied events in which the association between flares, CMEs, and MCs is identified, the MC flux is correlated with the total reconnection flux Phi(r). Further, the poloidal (azimuthal) MC flux Phi(p) is comparable with the reconnection flux Phi(r), and the toroidal (axial) MC flux Phi(t) is a fraction of Phi(r). Events associated with filament eruption do not exhibit a different Phi(t), (p)-Phi(r) relation from events not accompanied by erupting filaments. The relations revealed between these independently measured physical quantities suggest that for the studied samples, the magnetic flux and twist of interplanetary magnetic flux ropes, reflected by MCs, are highly relevant to low-corona magnetic reconnection during the eruption. We discuss the implications of this result for the formation mechanism of twisted magnetic flux ropes, namely, whether the helical structure of the magnetic flux rope is largely pre-existing or formed in situ by low-corona magnetic reconnection. We also measure magnetic flux encompassed in coronal dimming regions (Phi(d)) and discuss its relation to the reconnection flux inferred from flare ribbons and MC flux.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available