4.7 Article

SN 2006gy: An extremely luminous supernova in the galaxy NGC 1260

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 659, Issue 1, Pages L13-L16

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/516749

Keywords

galaxies : individual (NGC 1260); supernovae : general; supernovae : individual (SN 2006gy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With an extinction-corrected V-band peak absolute magnitude of about -22, supernova SN 2006gy is probably the brightest SN ever observed. We report on multiwavelength observations of this SN and its environment. Our spectroscopy shows an Ha emission line as well as absorption features that may be identified as Si II lines at low expansion velocity. The slow brightening, the peak luminosity, and the Ha emission line resemble those observed in hybrid Type IIn/Ia SNe ( also known as Type IIa) and may suggest that SN 2006gy is related to the Type IIa SNe class. The host galaxy, NGC 1260, is dominated by an old stellar population with solar metallicity. However, our high-resolution adaptive optics images reveal a dust lane in this galaxy, and there appears to be an H II region in the vicinity of the SN. The extraordinarily large peak luminosity, similar to 3 x 10(44) ergs s(-1), demands a dense circumstellar medium, regardless of the mass of the progenitor star. The inferred mass-loss rate of the progenitor is -0.1 M circle dot yr(-1) over a period of similar to 10 yr prior to explosion. Such an high mass-loss rate may be the result of a binary star common envelope ejection. The total radiated energy in the first 2 months is about 1.1 x 10(51) ergs, which is only a factor of 2 less than that available from a super-Chandrasekhar Type Ia explosion. Therefore, given the presence of a star-forming region in the vicinity of the SN and the high-energy requirements, a plausible scenario is that SN 2006gy is related to the death of a massive star.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available