4.7 Article

Safety and immunogenicity of a baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine - A randomized controlled trial

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 297, Issue 14, Pages 1577-1582

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.14.1577

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context A high priority in vaccine research is the development of influenza vaccines that do not use embryonated eggs as the substrate for vaccine production. Objective To determine the dose-related safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of an experimental trivalent influenza virus hemagglutinin (rHAO) vaccine produced in insect cells using recombinant baculoviruses. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at 3 US academic medical centers during the 2004-2005 influenza season among 460 healthy adults without high-risk indications for influenza vaccine. Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of saline placebo (n= 154); 75 mu g of an rHAO vaccine containing 15 mu g of hemagglutinin from influenza A/New Caledonia/20/ 99(H1N1) and influenza B/Jiangsu/10/ 03 virus and 45 mu g of hemagglutinin from influenza A/Wyoming/3/03(H3N2) virus ( n= 153); or 135 mu g of rHAO containing 45 mu g of hemagglutinin each from all 3 components ( n= 153). Serum samples were taken before and 30 days following immunization. Main Outcome Measures Primary safety end points were the rates and severity of solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Primary immunogenicity end points were the rates of 4-fold or greater increases in serum hemagglutinin inhibition antibody to each of the 3 vaccine strains before and 28 days after inoculation. The prespecified primary efficacy end point was culture-documented influenza illness, defined as development of influenza-like illness associated with influenza virus on a nasopharyngeal swab. Results Rates of local and systemic adverse effects were low, and the rates of systemic adverse effects were not different in either vaccine group than in the placebo group. Hemagglutinin inhibition antibody responses to the H1 component were seen in 3% of placebo, 51% of 75-mu g vaccine, and 67% of 135-mu g vaccine recipients, while responses to B were seen in 4% of placebo, 65% of 75-mu g vaccine, and 92% of 135-mu g vaccine recipients. Responses to the H3 component occurred in 11% of placebo, 81% of 75-mu g vaccine, and 77% of 135-mu g vaccine recipients. Influenza infections in the study population were due to influenza B and A( H3N2), and influenza A infections were A/California/7/2004 like viruses, an antigenically drifted strain. Seven cases of culture-confirmed CDC-defined influenza-like illness occurred in 153 placebo recipients(4.6%) compared with 2 cases(1.3%) in 150 recipients of 75 mu g of vaccine, and 0 cases in recipients of 135 mu g of vaccine. Conclusions In this study, a trivalent rHAO vaccine was safe and immunogenic in a healthy adult population. Preliminary evidence of protection against a drifted influenza A( H3N2) virus was obtained, but the sample size was small. Inclusion of a neuraminidase component did not appear to be required for protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available