4.6 Article

Multi-criteria decision making approach and experimental design as chemometric tools to optimize HPLC separation of domperidone and pantoprazole

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 1842-1848

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.12.007

Keywords

multiple response optimization; Derringer's desirability function; reversed-phase HPLC; central composite design; domperidone; pantoprazole

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper deals with multiple response simultaneous optimization using the Derringer's desirability function for the development of a reversed-phase HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of domperidone and pantoprazole in commercial pharmaceutical preparations. Twenty experiments, taking the retention factor of the first peak, the two resolutions, and three retention times as the responses with three important factors, mobile phase composition, buffer molarity and flow rate, were used to design mathematical models. The experimental responses were fitted into a second order polynomial and the six responses simultaneously optimized to predict the optimum conditions for the effective separation of the studied compounds. The optimum assay conditions were: methanol-acetonitrile-dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (pH 7.0; 15.3 mM) (20:33:47, v/v/v) as the mobile phase and at a flow rate of 1.19 ml/min. While using this optimum condition, baseline separation with a minimum resolution of 2.0 and a run time of less than 6 min were achieved. The method showed good agreement between the experimental data and predictive value throughout the studied parameter space. The optimized assay condition was validated according to ICH guidelines to confirm specificity, linearity, accuracy and precision. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available