4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of nikethamide and lidocaine in human blood and cerebrospinal fluid by high performance liquid chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 1757-1762

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.12.015

Keywords

nikethamide; lidocaine; reversed-phase HPLC; forensic toxicological analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nikethamide and lidocame are often requested to be quantified simultaneously in forensic toxicological analysis. A simple reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been developed for their simultaneous determination in human blood and cerebrospinal fluid. The method involves simple protein precipitation sample treatment followed by quantification of analytes using HPLC at 263 nm. Analytes were separated on a 5 mu m Zorbax Dikema C-18 column (150 mm x 4.60 mm, i.d.) with a mobile phase of 22:7 8 (v/v) mixture of methanol and a diethylamine-acetic acid buffer, pH 4.0. The mean recoveries were between 69.8 and 94.4% for nikethamide and between 78.9 and 97.2% for lidocame. Limits of detection (LODs) for nikethamide and lidocame were 0.008 and 0. 16 mu g/ml in plasma and 0.007 and 0. 14 mu g/ml in cerebrospinal fluid, respectively. The mean intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) for both analytes were less than 9.2 and 10.8%, respectively. The developed method was applied to blood sample analyses in eight forensic cases, where blood concentrations of lidocaine ranged from 0.68 to 34.4 mu g/ml and nikethamide ranged from 1.25 to 106.8 mu g/ml. In six cases cerebrospinal fluid analysis was requested. The values ranged from 20.3 to 185.6 mu g/ml of lidocame and 8.0 to 72.4 mu g/ml of nikethamide. The method is simple and sensitive enough to be used in toxicological analysis for simultaneous determination of nikethamide and lidocame in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available