4.5 Article

Polymeric nanocomposites for tribological applications

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 292, Issue 4, Pages 387-402

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mame.200600416

Keywords

fillers; films; nanocomposites; tribology; wear

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymer nanocomposites operate in applications where fluid and grease lubricants fail, and have superior tribological performance to traditional polymer composites. Nanoparticle fillers have been a part of notable reductions in the wear rate of the polymer matrix at very low loadings. Despite instances of remarkable wear reductions at unprecedented loadings (3 000 times at 0.5% loading in one case), there is a lack of general agreement within the literature on the mechanisms of wear resistance in these nanocomposites. In addition, results appear to vary widely from study to study with only subtle changes of the filler material or blending technique. The apparent wide variation in tribological results is likely a result of processing and experimental differences. Tribology is inherently complex with no governing laws for dry sliding friction or wear, and the state of the art in polymeric nanocomposites tribology includes many qualitative descriptors of important system parameters, such as particle dispersion, bulk mechanical properties, debris morphology, and transfer film adhesion, morphology, composition, and chemistry. The coupling of inherent tribological complexities with the complicated mechanics of poorly characterized nanocomposites makes interpretation of experimental results and the state of the field extremely difficult. This paper reviews the state of the art in polymeric nanocomposites tribology and highlights the need for more quantitative studies. Examples of such quantitative measurements are given from recent studies, which mostly involve investigation of polytetrafluoroethylene matrix nanocomposites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available