Journal
ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 4, Pages 946-959Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318249d0a7
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Medical Research Council (London, United Kingdom)
- National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland)
- Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium)
- European Commission
- University of Auckland
- Waikato District Health Board (Hamilton, New Zealand)
- Medical Research Council [G0802353] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [G0802353] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Consciousness is subjective experience. During both sleep and anesthesia, consciousness is common, evidenced by dreaming. A defining feature of dreaming is that, while conscious, we do not experience our environment; we are disconnected. Besides inducing behavioral unresponsiveness, a key goal of anesthesia is to prevent the experience of surgery (connected consciousness), by inducing either unconsciousness or disconnection of consciousness from the environment. Review of the isolated forearm technique demonstrates that consciousness, connectedness, and responsiveness uncouple during anesthesia; in clinical conditions, a median 37% of patients demonstrate connected consciousness. We describe potential neurobiological constructs that can explain this phenomenon: during light anesthesia the subcortical mechanisms sub-serving spontaneous behavioral responsiveness are disabled but information integration within the corticothalamic network continues to produce consciousness, and unperturbed norepinephrinergic signaling maintains connectedness. These concepts emphasize the need for developing anesthetic regimens and depth of anesthesia monitors that specifically target mechanisms of consciousness, connectedness, and responsiveness.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available