4.6 Review

Prevalence of Survivor Bias in Observational Studies on Fresh Frozen Plasma:Erythrocyte Ratios in Trauma Requiring Massive Transfusion

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages 716-728

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318245c47b

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observational studies on transfusion in trauma comparing high versus low plasma: erythrocyte ratio were prone to survivor bias because plasma administration typically started later than erythrocytes. Therefore, early deaths were categorized in the low plasma: erythrocyte group, whereas early survivors had a higher chance of receiving a higher ratio. When early deaths were excluded, however, a bias against higher ratio can be created. Survivor bias could be reduced by performing before-and-after studies or treating the plasma: erythrocyte ratio as a time-dependent covariate. We reviewed 26 studies on blood ratios in trauma. Fifteen of the studies were survivor bias-unlikely or biased against higher ratio; among them, 10 showed an association between higher ratio and improved survival, and five did not. Eleven studies that were judged survivor bias-prone favoring higher ratio suggested that a higher ratio was superior. Without randomized controlled trials controlling for survivor bias, the current available evidence supporting higher plasma: erythrocyte resuscitation is inconclusive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available