Is there a benefit from intensified medical and psychological interventions in patients with functional dyspepsia not responding to conventional therapy?

Aim In a prospective randomized, controlled trial, to compare the long-term outcome of intensive medical therapy (with or without cognitive-behavioural or muscle relaxation therapy) vs. standard medical therapy in patients with refractory functional dyspepsia (FD), referred to a tertiary referral medical center. Methods A total of 100 consecutive FD patients were allocated to a standardized symptom-oriented 4 month therapy (SMT, n = 24), intensive medical therapy (IMT, medical therapy with testing-for and targeting-of abnormalities of motor-and-sensory function, n = 28) or IMT plus psychological interventions (either progressive-muscle relaxation (IMT-MR, n = 20) or cognitive-behavioural therapy (IMT-CBT, n = 28). The symptom intensity (SI) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) after 12 months were prespecified primary outcome parameters. Results After 12 months, significantly greater improvement of SI occurred in patients with IMT-all (with or without psychological interventions) compared with SMT (P < 0.025 vs. IMT-all). IMT, IMT-MR and IMT-CBT alone also resulted in significantly better improvement of the primary outcome parameters (P all < 0.025 vs. SMT). HRQoL significantly improved in all groups with intensive medical therapy but not standard medical therapy. Differences between intensive medical therapy-all and standard medical therapy were not significant. Concomitant anxiety and depression was improved significantly by IMT-CBT (vs. SMT) but not other treatments. Conclusions In FD patients with refractory symptoms, intensified medical management involving function testing and psychological intervention yields superior long-term-outcomes. Additional CBT may be effective for the control of concomitant anxiety and depression.