4.7 Article

Quality of life among long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors - A population-based study

Journal

CANCER
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages 1659-1667

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22581

Keywords

non-Hodgkin lymphoma; long-term survivors; quality of life; Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors questionnaire; 36-item Short Form Health Survey

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The objective of this population-based study was to document the long-term effects (5-15 years postdiagnosis) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and its treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and social problems. METHODS. The population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was used to select all patients who were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma from 1989 to 1998. Three hundred sixty patients were invited to complete the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors questionnaire, and 294 patients (82%) responded. RESULTS. Patients who had received chemotherapy reported significantly worse psychological and social well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQL) than patients who had not received chemotherapy. Radiotherapy and watchful waiting were not associated significantly with HRQL outcomes. Patients who were diagnosed from 10 to 15 years earlier reported better social well-being than patients who were diagnosed from 5 to 9 years earlier. Compared with an age-matched, normative sample from the general population, patients reported significantly worse general health and less vitality, but they reported less bodily pain. Practical problems were reported with work (41%), obtaining health care insurance (6%) and life insurance (15%), and obtaining a home mortgage (22%). CONCLUSIONS. From 5 to 15 years after diagnosis, the general health perceptions and vitality levels of non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors remained significantly lower than those of their peers in the of general population. In addition, survivors faced practical problems with work and finances that deserve additional attention during the period of rehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available