4.6 Article

Theoretical studies of charge-transfer complexes of I2 with pyrazoles, and implications on the dye-sensitized solar cell performance

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.10.022

Keywords

ab initio MO calculation; charge-transfer complex; iodine; pyrazoles; dye-sensitized solar cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The charge-transfer 1:1 n-sigma* complexation between pyrazole derivatives and 1, was theoretically investigated by the ab initio molecular orbital (MO) method at the second-order Moller-Plesset (MP2, full)/LANL2DZ* level. The nitrogen atom at position 2 in the pyrazole ring and the amino nitrogen atom of the substituent were preferred over the other n-donor sites of the substituents as binding sites for I-2 molecules. By comparing pyrazoles complexes binding to I-2 via the nitrogen atom at position 2 in the pyrazole ring, it was determined that the more electron donicity the substituent has at positions 3 and 5 in the pyrazole ring, the more stable the intermolecular charge-transfer complex formed. However, pyrazoles with an electron-accepting substituent at position 4 formed less favorable complexes with I-2 even if they were substituted by electron-donating groups at positions 3 and/or 5. These pyrazoles were also examined as additives in an I-/I-3(-) electrolyte solution in a Ru(II) bipyridine dye-sensitized solar cell, and the resultant open-circuit photovoltage (V-oc) values were correlated with the intermolecular charge-transfer properties determined by theoretical calculations. The optimized geometries, Mulliken population analyses, and natural bond orbital (NBO) analyses indicated that a V-oc is higher when the I-2 and pyrazoles form a more favorable intermolecular charge-transfer complex in the I-/I-3(-) redox electrolytic solution of dye-sensitized solar cell. The V-oc enhancing mechanism by the pyrazoles-I-2 complexation is discussed. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available