4.6 Article

Merit function regression method for efficient alignment control of two-mirror optical systems

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 5059-5068

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.15.005059

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [E10300406A050000110] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [07-2501-906] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1403] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precision alignment of high-performance, wide-field optical systems is generally a difficult and often laborious process. We report a new merit function regression method that has the potential to bring to such an optical alignment process higher efficiency and accuracy than the conventional sensitivity table method. The technique uses actively damped least square algorithm to minimize the Zernike coefficient-based merit function representing the difference between the designed and misaligned optical wave fronts. The application of this method for the alignment experiment of a Cassegrain type collimator of 900mm in diameter resulted in a reduction of the mean system rms wave-front error from 0.283 lambda to 0.194 lambda, and in the field dependent wave-front error difference from +/- 0.2 lambda to +/- 0.014 lambda in just two alignment actions. These results demonstrate a much better performance than that of the conventional sensitivity table method simulated for the same steps of experimental alignment. (c) 2007 Optical Society of America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available