4.8 Article

Three functional variants of IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) define risk and protective haplotypes for human lupus

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701266104

Keywords

interferon pathway; systemic lupus erythematosus

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000052, M01 RR000079, 5 M01 RR-00079, M01-RR-00052] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K02 AI052170, R56 AI057484, R01 AI049494] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 43727, R01 AR043727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systematic genome-wide studies to map genomic regions associated with human diseases are becoming more practical. Increasingly, efforts will be focused on the identification of the specific functional variants responsible for the disease. The challenges of identifying causal variants include the need for complete ascertainment of genetic variants and the need to consider the possibility of multiple causal alleles. We recently reported that risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is strongly associated with a common SNP in IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRFS), and that this variant altered spicing in a way that might provide a functional explanation for the reproducible association to SLE risk. Here, by resequencing and genotyping in patients with SLE, we find evidence for three functional alleles of IRF5: the previously described exon 1B splice site variant, a 30-bp in-frame insertion/deletion variant of exon 6 that alters a proline-, glutamic acid-, serine- and threonine-rich domain region, and a variant in a conserved polyA+ signal sequence that alters the length of the 3'UTR and stability of IRFS mRNAs. Haplotypes of these three variants define at least three distinct levels of risk to SLE. Understanding how combinations of variants inf luence IRF5 function may offer etiological and therapeutic insights in SLE; more generally, IRF5 and SUE illustrates how multiple common variants of the same gene can together influence risk of common disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available